Critical Literature Review Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

censorious Literature Review - Coursework interpreterA cultural change is required to counter the widespread acceptance of dishonest practices. De Vries, et al. 2011 Personality traits such(prenominal) as conscientiousness, honesty-humility/ law are effective predictors of counterproductive schoolman behaviour. Jones & Spraakman 2011 Faculty members abettal of broad-based roveing among students caused the strengths dismissal, but administrators excused the students participation. Faulty integrity culture skewed students information of ethical behaviour. Kisamore, et al., 2007 Students with poorly-adjusted personality traits are more disposed to cheat due to the influence and interaction of integrity culture. Kitahara, et al., 2009 Case study demonstrated the effectiveness of employing multifaceted, hybrid approaches to ensure academic integrity. Larkin, et al., 2012 Additional enticements to plagiarize and cheat are provided by the use of online media, due to the ease of trans mitting exam questions and answers. Okoro, 2011 Plagiarism in entirely its forms is often difficult to communicate to students when merely stated in policy. Guided instruction strategies involving student-teacher interaction reduces incidences of unknowing plagiarism. Spain & Robles, 2011 Adoption and enforcement of a systematic Academic Integrity Policy makes adjudication of academic dishonesty cases more effective, reduces proximo such incidences, and establishes a culture of academic integrity. ... Table 1 Summary of academic journal articles Critical Comparison Determinants of academic integrity Integrity culture and personality traits A debate exists concerning the factors that determine academic integrity, most commonly cited of which are the academic integrity culture (Tippitt, et al., 2009), and students or faculty members personal characteristics (De Vries, et al., 2011). Tippitts findings on integrity culture is supported by the study by Jones & Spraakman (2011), that f ittingly explored the role that faculty members play in advancing academic misconduct. Faculty members willingness to cover up graduate students plagiarism or other forms of cheating to evacuate public scandal, and university administrators tendency to overlook these infractions and not discipline faculty members to avoid embarrassment, are common. The Jones et al. study made a good case for integrity culture because it focused on a specific instance where the faculty member himself instigated student misconduct by leaking the departmental interrogatory and quizzes to his class. The faculty member was dismissed, but the administrators decided to excuse the students and merely reduced en masse their grades kind of of disciplining them. The cultural issue surfaced in the fact that most of the students interviewed felt there was nothing wrong nigh obtaining an unfair advantage over the other sections, and did not feel they were responsible for reporting the conduct of their teacher or their peers participation. Integrity culture is also central in Thakkar and Weisfeld-Spolter (2012), who determined that acts constituting cheating